You see it more and more. A bench that’s strategically had another arm rest added right in the middle of the seat to prevent anyone from lying across. Spikes on flat surfaces that are just barely pretending to be aesthetic flourishes, and “coincidently” preventing anyone from sitting comfortably. Seats that are sloped ever so slightly, preventing more than a moment's rest. These design choices are part of a larger trend to prevent homeless citizens from accessing places of rest, some subtle, some less subtle.
It might make sense on the surface. A public bench is for sitting, not sleeping, so why shouldn’t we prevent people from using it as a bed? But there’s a dark underside to that train of thought. The implication that is being suggested here is that there is a “right” way to use a public service, and a “wrong” way. That simply is not the case. A public bench is meant to provide rest, nothing more, nothing less, and no citizen has a greater claim to it than another.
It’s all about appearances, really. When someone is denied a place to sleep due to hostile architecture, they do not suddenly no longer need somewhere to sleep. Instead they are simply being told that anywhere they choose to sleep should be out of the way, hidden. That’s not solving the problem of homelessness, that’s sweeping it under the rug and pretending it’s not there. And suppose every rest spot, every public seat is converted into these hostile forms of themselves. You’d be left with a city that says to anyone looking at it, “I chose to develop these ugly, tumorous growths because I wanted to ignore a problem rather than solve it.” A city should be beautiful, and it should have character, and it shouldn’t sacrifice these things to pretend that things are better than they are. You may find the sight of a homeless person sleeping on a bench unsightly. Is it more unsightly than an empty bench proudly proclaiming how discriminatory it is?
I don’t think so.
To see more of how this problem is developing in cities across the nation, take a look at this article: CLICK
No comments:
Post a Comment