Pages

Friday, June 10, 2022

Why We Need to Amplify the Voices of our Homeless Neighbors

 


“Man says alleged homeless person attacked him outside of Downtown Austin building” “Austin Businesses Express Safety Concerns, Consider Changing Operating Hours in Wake of City’s New Homeless Ordinance,” “What do residents want to see in Mayor Bruce Harrell's Seattle homelessness plan?,” “Op-Ed: Listen to the neighbors of homeless encampments. We aren’t just grousing.”

What do these headlines all have in common? While they all discuss the issue of homelessness, not a single one represents the voices, experiences, and challenges local unhoused individuals are going through. These are just a few recent headlines taken from local news sites in Austin, TX, Los Angeles, CA and Seattle, WA, but their sentiment is echoed in the news publications of every major city in the United States and it is something we need to be paying attention to. As the cost of living rises, more and more working families living in the nation’s major metropolitan areas are getting displaced. In cities like Oakland, CA, neighborhoods that were once considered “ghetto” and “undesirable” are experiencing the emergence of multi-billion dollar housing markets in response to housing demands for tech workers and developers. Developers pounce on foreclosed homes from families that could not keep up with the increased cost of living and employ the help of the police to secure their properties. The inevitable consequences of these displacements has been a surge in poverty and homelessness throughout every major metropolitan area of the US, and yet these stories remain largely invisible in mainstream and local news media.

Now, look back at these headlines. If they’re not representing the voices of the displaced and unhoused members of the community, who are they representing? They represent the local businessmen who fear the unhoused will scare away customers, affluent people moving into newly unoccupied spaces, and real estate developers seeking public support for the use of police violence to evict, sweep, and protect their newly acquired properties. The housing status of individuals involved in stories relating to petty theft, assaults, drug deals, and orgies is only ever mentioned when those individuals are homeless, at which point it becomes the central focus of the story. For story after story, these patterns repeat until homelessness becomes synonymous with crime and danger. This unequal representation of perspectives works to create a climate of fear and dehumanization between unhoused people and their neighbors.

It is important to note that this is by design. The majority of all news media is owned by just 5 companies, with almost every single local station in the United States being a subsidiary to major players like Sinclair Broadcast Group. Sinclair owns a number of private equity firms and investment groups throughout the country, holding equity in real estate developments in several major cities – and they are far from the only media group this can be said for. Media companies that don’t hold equity in real estate are no less beholden to their interest, as advertising funds and lobbying efforts from real estate investors allow them to nonetheless use local news media as a platform. To better understand this practice, take a look at this article, written by the director of the Center for Housing Economics - a Seattle based lobbying group comprised of the city's biggest real estate groups.

This has real world consequences, as studies have found that violent policing of homeless populations is largely at the behest of these same groups. With such powerful groups dominating access to information and framing issues in ways that only serve their interest, we need local people now more than ever, especially those with a platform and the means to spread messages, to step up and lend their privilege and power to amplify the voices of our homeless neighbors. Their voices deserve to be heard, and their interests deserve to be represented as much as any of ours.

- Brian Reynoso Espinosa

Homelessness Among Queer Youth

Here in the United States, ample research has found that LGBTQ+ youth are more likely to experience homelessness than their non-queer counterparts.

According to a study conducted by Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago in partnership with Voices of Youth Count, queer young people are at more than double the risk of being unhoused.

Moreover, this same study found that queer homeless youth endure significantly higher rates of physical, emotional, and sexual violence– numbers that increase drastically in Black LGBTQ+ youth.

For a highly accessible one-page summary of their report including recommendations for going forward, visit this website.

Photo by Joeli Katz courtesy of Glaad.org

June being Pride Month, many companies and organizations have partnered with the goal of alleviating

this suffering. There are numerous ways for you to take advantage of these special opportunities to

make an impact through continuing to shop as you normally would.


True Colors United is a well established foundation that has been fighting this issue since 2008.

They provide unique ways to donate through shopping here.


Another leading organization fighting homelessness in young people is Covenant House, which emphasizes that their homes provide safe and affirming refuge for LGBTQ+ individuals.

In June, any donation you make will be DOUBLED. Your gift will support their work in the United States, Canada, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and Nicaragua. To do so, follow this link.

-Sam Guadagno

How Providing Housing For Unhoused Americans Can Save Taxpayers Money

 

 


According to a 2021 report from the National Alliance to End Homelessness, there are an estimated 580,466 Americans experiencing homelessness. Of those, an estimated 84,000 are experiencing chronic homelessness – these are individuals and families who are experiencing long term homelessness due to chronic, difficult, and debilitating health conditions such as mental, substance abuse and medical conditions. Without stable access to shelter or dedicated care facilities, many chronically unhoused individuals have little recourse but to make regular rotations through emergency rooms, short term stays in hospital inpatient and mental health wards, detox and rehabilitation centers, as well as jails and prison. These practices are unsustainable, however, as they put a significant strain on the budgets of local municipalities while the short-term nature of these services and institutions makes them incapable of leading to better health or material outcomes for the individuals who cycle between them.

A solution that has been proven to both reduce taxpayer cost and result in better health and material outcomes for unhoused individuals is Permanent Supportive Housing. Permanent Supportive Housing means not only providing individuals experiencing chronic homelessness with stable, affordable places to live permanently, but crucially, case management and access to supportive care. A number of studie have compared the cost of living in major US cities and average cost of the aforementioned taxpayer funded services for each chronically unhoused individual (est. $35,000 per year per person) with the estimated cost of providing permanent housing as well as case management and dedicated services. On average, the studies have found that Permanent Supportive Housing would cost an estimated $12,800 per person, per year – with an average reduction in spending by 49.5%.

A map outlining the estimated costs of permanent supportive house by the National Alliance to End Homelessness is available below:

 

- Brian Reynoso Espinsoa 

Source:

https://endhomelessness.org/resource/ending-chronic-homelessness-saves-taxpayers-money-2/