http://heavy.com/news/2014/11/keystone-xl-pipeline-facts-map-news-senate-house/ |
If you haven’t heard much about the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal, click here for a list of pros and cons of the bill.
Environmentalist
groups were concerned the potential damages associated with construction of the pipeline. One major concern was that the plan for the pipeline would cross a
crucial aquifer that supplies a large amount of the fresh water for Midwestern
states that is used for not only drinking water, but field irrigation as well. An oil spill could put that aquifer at risk. Another oil spill concern is the potential for contaminating the soil
associated with food production in the farmlands surrounding the pipeline.
Outside of oil spills, should one occur, approving the construction could make it
easier to extract oil from tar sands which is what some call a "dirty" supply of energy. This would ultimately result in more crude oil use and therefore increase CO2 levels.
This could increase levels of acid rain, which in turn might affect soil
fertility.
There has been much
political debate over this issue. The veto gives the executive branch the
ability to consider the effects of the construction themselves in terms of
economic benefits as well as environmental impacts.
Added by: Erin Kashuba
Added by: Erin Kashuba
No comments:
Post a Comment