Today, The Guardian announced that the US government will be
banning the usage of microbeads in a historic piece of legislation called the
Microbead Free Waters Act. Starting July 1, 2017, microbeads will begin to be
phased out of personal care products as a means to help prevent further
pollution in our lakes and oceans. With this bill rolling out, it’s curious to
see how people perceive microbeads and whether or not they understand the
environmental effects these little beads have. Below are some of their responses found in a recent Reddit thread.
User budgiebum was taken aback by the large-scale effects of
such tiny plastics stating, “Yeah I thought they were like... little scrubbers
to exfoliate the skin within the soap to double scrub your skin and that they
dissolved. I feel bad for using soaps with them now.”
User tatertatertatertot is happy with the change and is
celebrating the government’s initiative to keep our environment clean: “I am
happy that small, but fairly substantive and meaningful, policies like this
still manage to get through Congress with bipartisan support. And that not
everything becomes like that 'feds are confiscating our light bulbs' fight because of posturing or corruption.
This is a good regulation/law, and it's actually going to be
passed. Glad it still happens sometimes.”
User whollyhemp is an owner of a soap/skin care company and
helps give us insight into the perception of microbeads in the personal health
product atmosphere: “It's about time. I own a soap/skin care manufacturing
company and from day one I refused to use these plastic microbeads. Everyone
else in the industry saw absolutely no problem with flushing environmentally
destructive plastic beads down our drains, and for the longest time us bead ban
proponents were seen as crazy hippies.
When you hear these companies say 'recent reports show
that these beads are destructive' they are lying. Industry leaders have
known for years the damage done by microbeads, and I'm not talking about some
crackpot hippie blog, there were articles and studies about the dangers and
destruction of microbeads going back years and since money trumps all, the
companies just feigned ignorance and continued to pump out these products.
Even now, in my home state of CA which just passed a
[statewide] microbead ban, companies are allowed to continue manufacturing and
selling these products over the next year.
Because while we recognize they are doing irreversible
damage to the environment, I guess their potential profitability and the need
to deplete stock/inventory is more important than clean water.”
Last, but not least, user challenge4 stated the most obvious question we've all been asking ourselves: "Who was the ***hole who thought putting trash in soap was a
good idea?"
For readers interested in purchasing personal hygiene products that refuse to incorporate microbeads, Robert Lestak runs an online shop called Wholly Hemp utilizing natural ingredients in an array of products ranging from sea salt shower scrubs to pink grapefruit soap. His shop can be found here.
References: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/3wdcl4/us_to_ban_soaps_and_other_products_containing/
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/08/us-to-ban-soaps-other-products-containing-microbeads
Thanks for your great share about natural skin care products. I appreciate your posts.
ReplyDeletemicrobeads in skin care products